A Federal High Court in Abuja has
dismissed the suit filed by the Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki, to
stop his trial on charges of false asset declaration before the Code of
Conduct Tribunal in Abuja.
Saraki had asked the court to quash the
charges and nullify the proceedings before the CCT on the grounds that
they were initiated in violation of his rights to fair hearing.
But in his judgment on Friday, Justice
Abdukadir Abdu-Kafarati held that the suit, filed under the fundamental
human rights enforcement rules, lacked jurisdiction to entertain it and
that it constituted an abuse of court process.
The respondents to the suit include,
Attorney-General of the Federation, Mr. Abubakar Malami (SAN), the
Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, the Independent Corrupt
Practices and other related offences Commission, and the Inspector
General of Police, Mr. Solomon Arase.
Others are the Code of Conduct Bureau,
the CCT; the CCT chairman, Umar; the second member of the CCT panel, Mr.
Ataedzeagu Adza, CCB chairman, Mr. Sam Saba and the Director of Public
Prosecutions of the Federal Ministry of Justice, Mr. Mohammed Diri.
The judge, who upheld the respondents’
preliminary objection to the suit without considering the merit of the
case, ruled that the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit
as the prayers sought were not available under Chapter 4 (which deals
with fundamental human rights) of the Constitution.
The judge also ruled that the suit
constituted an abuse of court of process the Supreme Court having
earlier validated his trial before the CCT and Saraki having filed
similar application before the CCT.
The court ruled that granting the
prayers sought by Saraki, would amount to interfering with the powers
granted the respondents to investigate crimes and prosecute offenders.
He ruled, “A careful examination of the
reliefs sought showed that if grant it will amount to interference with
the powers of the respondents.
“The prayers are not captured under Chapter 4 of the Constitution.
“I cannot also do anything that will
interfere with the powers of the respondents to prosecute crimes which
the Constitution has given them the power to do.
“Since the apex court has ruled that the
prosecution of the applicant before the Code of Conduct Tribunal is in
order it is not appropriate for the respondents to approach this court
to seek reliefs quashing the charges.”
The judge also ruled that the allegation
of political humiliation on which the suit was anchored was merely a
sentiment lacked legal basis.
The judge recalled that as of the time
of hearing the suit, the applicant had filed an application before the
CCT asking for similar prayers as contained in the suit.
“If I go ahead to grant the reliefs it will be in conflict with the decision of the Code of Conduct Tribunal,” the judge ruled.
In view of the above findings I hold
that the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the suit because the reliefs
are not available under Chapter 4 of the Constitution.
The judge ruled, “The originating motion constitutes an abuse of court process.
“The suit is liable to be dismissed and it is accordingly dismissed.”
Saraki, through his lawyer, Mr. Ajibola
Oluyede, asked in the suit for an order halting his ongoing trial before
the Code of Conduct Tribunal on 13 counts of false and anticipatory
assets declaration.
The Senate President alleged in the suit
that the charges preferred against him before the CCT infringed on his
right to fair hearing.
He sought an order nullifying the
charges and the proceedings of the CCT on the grounds that they
allegedly fell short of the requirements of Article 3 of the African
Charter on Human and Peoples Rights and Section 36 of the 1999
Constitution.
Comments
Post a Comment